Donate to ASES!

Getting To Yes in a New England Historic District

SysAccKesslerBy Will Kessler

If New England is to hoist itself up from reliance on fossil-based energy, we need to re-think some priorities and look at solar panels differently.  A solar developer working in an historic district or an older building is often confronted with a hurdle called “contextual appropriateness.”  Often, the process for approval by the HAHJ (Historical Authority Having Jurisdiction) is barely navigable.  A typical review of a project is likely to include scrutiny of roof layouts, roof-to-panel standoff distance and even the color of the PV cells.  The installer may be asked to make the array completely invisible from the history district.  It is not easy, finding solar panels that blend in with architecture of the Revolutionary War era.

So it was with slight trepidation that I represented my company before the Exeter Historic District Commission in spring of 2011, along with the client.  Richard Russman, founder of Russman Law Office, wanted to offset 100 percent of the office electric load with solar power.   We proposed a 4.8-kilowatt array using 20 240-watt Sunpower modules filling the main rooftop. That rooftop is highly visible from right in the middle of the District.  It  ovelooks the Exeter Post Office, further southward to the buildings of the Phillips Exeter Academy (established in 1781), and is two doors from the Exeter Congregational Church (built in 1798.)

And so it was more than surprising to watch the hearing open and then close, with the Commissioners delivering a unanimous vote of approval.  I remember one of them echoing a letter written in support of the project saying “The point is not to turn Exeter into an Old Sturbridge village, but to make sure we preserve a sense of history while moving forward.”

Depending on the annual electricity usage at Russman Law Office, the old building may actually be a net-generator of renewable electricity, running the electric loads amongst the brick facades and hand-hewn beams around it.  This should make the project especially appealing from an economic standpoint, since the local utility (Unitil) is required to provide the customer reimbursement for avoided electricity costs under New Hampshire’s net-generation statute, HB 1353.

And there is always another context beyond the immediate one.   As an installer of rooftop solar systems, I meet more and more people in historic areas looking to fix their long term costs, offset pollution from unsustainable energy sources, and looking hopefully towards local historic commissions for a progressive view.  James Bruni, another client who has solar thermal collectors on his property in the historic West End of Portland, Maine, states he was glad of the installation since the collectors reduce operating costs of the building, and allow greater focus on maintenance and preservation projects.   “The collectors do not detract from the aesthetic of the building,” Bruni said. “In fact reinforce the ability to protect the integrity of old houses for generations to come.”

It may take a small revolution, but it seems like New Englanders are starting to view solar panels through the traditional lens of common sense.

Will Kessler is a NABCEP PV installer for ReVision Energy, which has offices in Portland and Liberty, Maine, and in Exeter, N.H. (revisionenergy.com).

 

25 Responses to Getting To Yes in a New England Historic District

  1. Pingback: auto injury attorney

  2. Pingback: rocketport serial hub

  3. Pingback: bielizna

  4. Pingback: so why am I so exhausted

  5. Pingback: Kyle Leon Scam

  6. Pingback: smoke free electronic cigarette

  7. Pingback: movers marietta ga

  8. Pingback: pain neck shoulder

  9. Pingback: best anti wrinkle skin cream

  10. Pingback: free grant money from the government

  11. Pingback: hack facebook account

  12. Pingback: network marketing

  13. Pingback: paintless-dent-repair.org

  14. Pingback: 600 credit score mortgage

  15. Pingback: credit scores and mortgage loans

  16. Pingback: dui lawyer Phoenix

  17. Pingback: go here

  18. Pingback: NormalBreathing.com

  19. Pingback: Dave

  20. Pingback: job in vietnam

  21. Pingback: pos cash drawer

  22. Pingback: custom business card holder with logo

  23. Pingback: caddishly canfieldite join

  24. First-year data hasn’t yet come in. But the (wicked sunny!) site was estimated by NREL’s PVWatts model to have yield of ~1289 kWh / kW x year. So that would put annual production around 6,180 kWh / year, and the solar fraction somewhere between 100% and 115% of the offices total electricity usage. The average net rate for NH is around $0.15 / kWh, so annual avoided electricity costs are expected to be around $800 – 900.

    New Hampshire also has a very strong set of commercial rebates that Russman smartly leveraged. The state PUC provides businesses a production-based rebate for up to 25% (cap) of a solar array’s installed cost. That is in addition to the federal tax credits and depreciation… none of which come near what Exxon Mobil or AIG take home. The final payback would then be about 7 years. (check out my other article in ST (July 2009) for why the simple payback is too simple.)

    Thanks Exeter HD for approving solar in a great location. Anyone in the area, I’d encourage to stop in the office and say hi to the lovely ladies who run the office (they also have the system’s wireless production monitor!)

    Will Kessler January 10, 2013 at 2:44 pm
  25. What did the 20-240 Sunpower modules put out in kWh for the buliding ? How much did it save the owners on their power bill ?

    TwoEagles Solar January 10, 2013 at 2:03 pm