<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American Solar Energy Society &#187; primestar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ases.org/tag/primestar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ases.org</link>
	<description>Leading the Renewable Energy Revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 22:12:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Abound’s Upgrade Draws Fire</title>
		<link>http://www.ases.org/abounds-upgrade-draws-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ases.org/abounds-upgrade-draws-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Masia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Solar@Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadmium telluride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cdte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primestar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Barry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ases.org/?p=1579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plan your technology upgrades carefully. Click to read more.]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_1580" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="2012/03/abounds-upgrade-draws-fire/abound_solar_line/" rel="attachment wp-att-1580"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1580" src="http://i0.wp.com/ases.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Abound_Solar_line.jpg?resize=300%2C154" alt="" data-recalc-dims="1" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Abound Solar automated production line (Abound photo)</p></div>
<p>Back in April 2011, General Electric’s PrimeStar subsidiary in Arvada, Colo., announced that it had achieved 12.8 percent efficiency for its cadmium-telluride modules. In October, in a press conference, solar program director Danielle Merfeld said that GE’s next generation of CdTe modules, slated for production this year in Aurora, Colo., would function at 14 percent efficiency – and reduce installation costs with a larger, lighter form factor.</p>
<p>This put Colorado’s other pioneer CdTe manufacturer in a bind. Abound Solar, in Longmont, was completing another of its highly-automated production lines. They were shipping modules with a rated efficiency of 10.5 percent, and weren’t going to be able to compete with the new giant neighbor.</p>
<p>Abound did, however, have a prototype ready, rated by NREL at 12.2 percent efficiency, for a peak output of 82.8 watts. Because mass production permits fast, repetitive testing, the company expected that in converting the production line to the new model, they could push the efficiency a bit higher, near 13 percent, and sell an 85-watt module. That could put them back in the commercial game this year.</p>
<p>The problem with a highly-automated production line, however, is that switching over to a new product requires more than retraining workers. It means shutting down for retooling, reprogramming, trial runs and QA testing (for background see the SOLAR TODAY interview with <a href="http://www.solartoday-digital.org/solartoday/20090708#pg26" target="_blank">Abound’s process engineering manager Tim Barry</a>). It means a lot of work for production engineers, while production workers stand idle.</p>
<p>At the end of February, Abound sent out this press release:</p>
<blockquote><p>Abound Solar, a leading manufacturer of thin-film cadmium telluride photovoltaic modules, today announced that the company will cease production of its first-generation solar module in order to accelerate the manufacturing process and equipment changes needed for the production launch of its next generation high-efficiency module.</p>
<p>Abound Solar&#8217;s new high efficiency &#8220;AB2&#8243; 85 watt module represents a 12.5 percent solar efficiency as verified by the U.S. Department of Energy&#8217;s National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL). Several-hundred AB2 modules were produced in early January 2012 on commercial production equipment.</p>
<p>The suspension of first generation module production will result in the temporary reduction of approximately 180 permanent jobs from its Colorado facilities. Once manufacturing equipment has been modified and performance tested, Abound Solar expects to resume mass production with a 12.5-13 percent efficiency module by the end of 2012.</p></blockquote>
<p>Naturally, local and national news media reported the layoff in ominous terms. The Forbes website ran the headline “<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/toddwoody/2012/03/01/abound-solar-recipient-of-400-million-federal-loan-guarantee-halts-production/" target="_blank">Abound, Recipient of $400 million federal loan guarantee, halts production</a>.” ABC’s web report was headlined “<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/abound-solar-400m-fed-loan-low-rating/story?id=15833266" target="_blank">Abound Solar Got $400M Fed Loan Despite Low Rating</a>.”</p>
<p>Inevitably, the Abound retooling process will be unfairly compared to the Solyndra bankruptcy. The lesson for the industry: Plan your technology upgrades very, very carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ases.org/abounds-upgrade-draws-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Module margins shrink in silicon price war</title>
		<link>http://www.ases.org/module-margins-shrink-in-silicon-price-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ases.org/module-margins-shrink-in-silicon-price-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Masia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first solar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[general electric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inventory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jinko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ldk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primestar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qcells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solarworld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suntech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yingli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ases.org/?p=1907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160; Third-quarter estimates for silicon solar manufacturers showed declining margins and profits, as average selling price (ASP) sank about 30 percent, toward $1 per watt. But despite an inventory glut, there’s little evidence of a slowdown in production at the major factories. SunPower, the strongest presence in the U.S. market, reports a strong revenue gain [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<header>
<h1></h1>
</header>
<div>
<p>Third-quarter estimates for silicon solar manufacturers showed declining margins and profits, as average selling price (ASP) sank about 30 percent, toward $1 per watt. But despite an inventory glut, there’s little evidence of a slowdown in production at the major factories.</p>
<p>SunPower, the strongest presence in the U.S. market, reports a strong revenue gain for Q3, up 19 percent to $705 million, from $550 million a year ago. But gross margin drops from 20.4 percent to 10.8 percent.</p>
<p><strong>Chinese Production Still Rising</strong></p>
<p>In China, global market-share leader Suntech estimated that shipments will increase 13 percent in the quarter. Revenue will rise to more than $800 million (up at least 7 percent from $744 million a year ago), but gross margin erodes from 18 percent to 13 percent for the quarter.</p>
<p>Yingli Green Energy expects module shipments for the third quarter to increase by “a low twenties percentage quarter over quarter,” which would put revenue at about $600 million, compared to $491 million a year ago. Margins fall from 33.3 percent in Q3 2010 to about 10 or 11 percent this quarter.</p>
<p>Trina Solar estimated third-quarter module shipments at 372 megawatts (MW) to 375 MW, with gross margins (for all products) at 10 to 11 percent. Shipments rose about 28 percent from 291 MW in Q3 2010, while overall gross margin fell from 31.4 a year ago.</p>
<p>Canadian Solar expects shipments to be 350 MW to 360 MW, up about 77 percent from a year ago. The price drop sends gross margin spinning from 17.3 percent in Q3 last year to somewhere between 2 and 5 percent this quarter.</p>
<p>Despite a three-week shutdown of its Haining factory after a fluoride spill, Jinko Solar estimated that module shipments in Q3 will soar about 59 percent, from 135 MW a year ago to 210-220 MW, while revenue rises just 29 percent from $215 million a year ago to $270-280 million on the quarter. Jinko hasn’t announced an estimated gross margin for this quarter, but it falls sharply from a record 33.5 percent in Q3 2010.</p>
<p>LDK, which makes polysilicon ingots and wafers as well as complete modules, saw module shipments roughly double, from 94 MW in Q3 2010 to about 185-190 MW for the same period in 2011 – but gross margin (company-wide) fell from 22.2 percent to between 3.5 and 5 percent.</p>
<p>China Sunergy reported $146 million in revenue for the third quarter, up 16 percent over the year earlier, while shipments jumped 32 percent to 116 MW, up from 88 MW.</p>
<p><strong>European Factories Scaling Back</strong></p>
<p>Shipments from European factories fell off a cliff. Q-cells reported Q3 shipments at EUR 229 million, down 43 percent from EU 402 million in Q3 2010. Production fell 49 percent, from 305 MW in Q3 2010 to 156 MW in Q3 2011. Sunways AG reported that while module production rose very slightly over Q3 2010 (11.3 MW to 11.4 MW), module revenue dropped 26 percent, from EUR 19 million to EUR 14 million. SolarWorld increased production 2 percent, from 191 MW in Q3 2010 to 195 MW, but revenue fell 30 percent, from EUR 342 million in Q3 2010 to EUR 238 million this year.</p>
<p><strong>Thin-Film Leaders Respond</strong></p>
<p>Downward pressure on prices from Chinese silicon put some thin-film start-ups into receivership this year. Market-share leader First Solar this week passed the 5-gigawatt mark in total shipments. The company scaled back its forecast for the fiscal year, but estimated Q3 revenues of $1 billion, up 20 percent from $798 billion a year earlier, with a healthy gross margin of 42 percent. That cost structure suggests shipments of about 600 MW during the quarter. Going forward, the company will face vigorous competition from General Electric, which will scale its PrimeStar division from 30 MW to 300 MW (annualized) over the next two years.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ases.org/module-margins-shrink-in-silicon-price-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>