In this section, we will take a look at some different information and graphics that break down factors such as Boulders total energy usage, the main sources, the energy resource mix that provides power, and more.
*If it is not otherwise stated, all numbers are in the units of metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent.
The Climate Mobilization Action Plan (CMAP) is the City of Boulder’s comprehensive, community-centered plan to take action on the global and the local climate crisis.
As this graphic highlights, CMAP shares ZEN’s value of creating a cleaner future through the efforts of an entire community. This graphic highlights some of the plan’s most important goals such as creating a 15 minute neighborhood, implementing large-scale carbon sequestration, regenerating our land, and more. The graphic also mentions some more ambitious long term goals, most notably for 100% of our energy to come from renewable sources. It is also important not to overlook CMAP’s final step, sharing what we learn. Boulder, Colorado is a progressive community with many of the resources necessary to become a role model for other cities to reduce their emissions. While we may be succeeding in fixing our own local climate crisis, the global crisis rages on and we should do all that we can to share what we have learned with other communities that are facing our same challenges. For more information about CMAP and what your local Boulder government is doing to fight the climate crisis, visit their web page here.
If you have been listening to the recent news around Boulder you may have heard the term municipalization thrown around, if not, you came to the right place. Municipalization is the local government acquisition of corporate assets, specifically, Xcel energy. The City of Boulder wishes to undergo utility provisioning for its citizens instead of Xcel. In other words, the City of Boulder is attempting to acquire the operation of the energy grid from Xcel energy. But what exactly does this mean? For the most detailed explanation and the most updated news on this important local topic, please visit the City of Boulder’s website on this topic. If you are still here, we want to provide you with some of the pros and cons of this hot button issue. The City of Boulder claims that if municipalization goes through, we can achieve emissions reductions quicker and cheaper. With the energy grid in the hands of the city, they hope to remove 100% of emissions from electricity by 2030, electricity emissions currently account for half of all of Boulders emissions.
Boulders ambitious goal is to reach an 80% reduction in all emissions by 2030. If the energy grid stays in the hands of Xcel, the city predicts they could only achieve a 50% reduction of overall emissions. As of 2019, the state of Colorado has mandated Xcel to lower their emissions by 80% meaning Boulder would not achieve the 100% reduction that they hoped for, but would still receive a large reduction from Xcel. The discussion is not as black and white as this sounds. Some of the important consideration against municipalization include the extreme upfront costs to the city and the stranded costs of Xcel’s equipment that would no longer be used. Additionally, Boulder is still working on constructing a complete financial analysis for all of the costs, for updates on this, check out the City of Boulder’s web page (linked above).
There is also a third available option that must be considered. Instead of the municipalization of the energy grid by the city of Boulder, or just leaving it in the hands of Xcel, the third option is to pay for energy certificates. In this scenario, Xcel would still control the energy grid, but the City of Boulder would buy either wind or solar energy certificates to essentially offset the non-renewable energy that Xcel is using. The annual costs would be around $150,000-$700,000 for the City, much less than the cost of municipalization. Additionally, as the energy grid improves, this cost would decrease. The biggest argument against this considers the question, are we simply trying to displace our non-renewable energy, or are we actually trying to improve our emissions in Boulder? If we paid for energy certificates, it might disincentivise both Xcel and the City to put resources towards improving our own grid, since we are just paying for the renewable energy from somewhere else.
Attached is a brochure that is a catered towards understanding the complicated issues surrounding Boulder’s municipalization process, we have tried not to take a side, instead we have just given the facts.
For those of you who want to learn more about Boulders energy grid, what “the grid” is, and more about energy, here is a helpful list of information: